那一场呼啸而过的青春Australia's defense‑funded report hypes risks to subsea cables to 'serve military goals'_我的网站
一 |  Published by the National Security College at the Australian National University (ANU), the paper claimed recent damage to cables in the Baltic Sea and around China's Taiwan region suggests "state actors are now actively probing and testing cable infrastructure in peacetime as part of broader hybrid warfare strategies" to rapidly degrade connectivity at the outset of a conflict, The Australian reported. The paper claimed 16 privately owned subsea cables that carry 99 percent of Australia's internet traffic are a "high priority target" for Australia's adversaries that could be severed in a conflict, threatening the nation's economy and social fabric, according to The Australian. The report singled out China and Russia for blame, saying that there have been multiple apparent attacks on submarine cables in recent years in European waters as well as near China's Taiwan region, suspected to be linked to Russia and China, the Straits Times reported. However, the report cites a 2025 voyage by Chinese research vessel Tan Suo Yi Hao along Australia's western and southern coastlines as evidence to back its claim that "potential adversaries are actively gathering information about Australia's cable infrastructure." This report, relying on the routine scientific operations of a Chinese research vessel in 2025 to level allegations of offensive actions against China, and employing ambiguous terminology such as "suspected" and "potential," demonstrates Australia's evidentiary leap, Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday. This erroneous claim was refuted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry at the time. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on March 31, 2025 that China carries out normal activities at sea in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS. "We hope Australia will have a right understanding of this and stop the groundless suspicion and speculations," Guo added. This is not the first time certain Australian politicians has leveled baseless accusations of China intending to sabotage its undersea cables. Back in May, Defense Minister Richard Marles claimed during the Shangri-La Dialogue that China ought to boost transparency around its maritime operations. He also asserted that a surge in damage to subsea cables had transformed the seabed into a "battlefield," per The Australian. Chen said Australian side's scaremongering is tied to its predictive threat‑perception framework forged in recent years. This framework designates China and other countries as strategic competitors in advance, subsequently forces routine scientific activities into a confrontational framework, Chen said. Apart from unfounded allegations against China, the paper claims Australia's defense military "must incorporate the defense of submarine cable infrastructure into its operational planning," according to The Australian. It added the government should also consider up¬grading an auxiliary ship operated by the navy, ADV Guidance, to enable it to repair damaged cables. The vast majority of submarine cable damages are caused by accidental factors such as fishing operations and vessel anchoring, rather than deliberate sabotage. For suspected cases of intentional damage, independent technical investigation bodies should be established, and the principle of "investigate first, characterize later" should be strictly applied, so as to prevent ordinary maritime accidents from escalating into diplomatic conflicts, Chen said. The core problem of Australian side's submarine cable security lies entirely with itself. Instead of addressing its own infrastructure shortcomings and improving its domestic protection and maintenance systems, the Australian side has chosen to continually exaggerate external threats and stoke bloc confrontation, the expert added. Chen said that by fabricating alleged Chinese threats, Australian side seeks to "rationalize" its military spending increases and underwater force expansion. The submarine digital infrastructure originally meant to serve global development has been labeled along us versus them lines, and this constitutes the biggest hidden danger, he added. 。 快科技8月24日消息，据媒体报道，近日，国内外AI圈因为一头来历不明的牛又炸了。一个叫Ox Alpha的模型悄没声地出现在OpenRouter和OpenCode上，并在首日冲至OpenRouter榜首，刷新单日模型用量历史纪录。OpenRouter页面显示，仅Hermes、Claude Code等前五大入口累计用量就已超过4万亿Token。此外，Ox Alpha还终结了DeepSeek在OpenCode连续56天霸榜的纪录，成为全球开发者近两日集中使用的新晋“模型”。根据平台公布的信息，Ox Alpha被定义为一款专注代码编写、长时间智能体（Agent）任务以及实际生产环境的前沿AI模型。 。
二 | 在核心参数与技术指标上，它展现出了极高的上限：其上下文窗口容量达到约104.8万token，最大输出长度为13.1万token，并且全面支持文本、图像与视频的多模态输入，目前在预览期间向开发者提供免费调用服务。与此同时，开源终端编程智能体OpenCode也在同一天宣布接入该模型，并为其准备了每天高达100万亿token的惊人调用容量。
三 | Ox就是牛，再加上最近抽象电影《牛来》的梗火遍全网，于是国内网友干脆给它安排了个亲切昵称——“牛来大模型”。
四 | 上线仅数小时，Ox Alpha便吸引了大量开发者的密集评测。独立研究员本·戴维斯选用软件工程基准DeepSWE中的10个子任务对其进行了严格测试。结果显示，Ox Alpha的通过率达到了约80%，表现超越了一众行业知名模型，包括通过率为65%的Claude Fable 5、62%的GLM-5.3与Grok 4.6，以及52%的GPT-5.6 Sol。不过，业内人士也指出，这组数据目前源自个人研究员的初步测试，DeepSWE官方排行榜尚未正式收录该模型。多名谷歌DeepMind研究员发帖暗示这是Gemini新版，令Ox Alpha与谷歌新模型之间的猜测快速升温。
五 | 但社区以分词器指纹与报错码取证，将其指向中国模型厂商智谱GLM系列，但目前智谱方面并未确认这一模型归属。值得关注的是，OpenCode宣称已为Ox Alpha准备每日100T Token的服务容量，供全球开发者近乎无上限的真实场景压测。如果后续中国模型身份得到确认，意味着国产大模型不仅能在跑分上逼近海外前沿水平，还可能已经具备承接万亿级Token调用、支撑全球Agent工作负载的上量能力。
六 |
Current article:http://v7gtc.minshixuanhabing.bond/6lm/qkrmlr.html Published on:20:07:59 |
